RESULTS
Proof Over Promises

How 6 Companies Transformed Their Capital — Without Giving Up Control

Real clients. Real numbers. Real results — every single one through referral, not advertising. These are the engagements we're proudest of, selected from over 60 completed transactions since 2015.

See What We Can Do For You

$1.4 billion facilitated since 2015. Six stories. Zero ads.

Each case study below follows the same format: the challenge the client brought us, the measurable metrics that changed, and the capital structure we delivered. Names and details are shared with client permission. Where specifics are altered for confidentiality, we say so.

These six engagements span five of the six industries we serve and cover seven of the ten services we offer. Each was led by our six-person specialist team working through our five-phase advisory process.

6 Client Engagements
$361M Total Capital Structured
$7.8M+ Combined Annual Savings
13.5 wks Average Time to Close
100% Ownership Retained
Zero Personal Guarantees
Ridgeline Oilfield Services Ltd. Oil & Gas Services Red Deer, AB Revenue: ~$85M

Ridgeline had accumulated a patchwork of 4 separate facilities from 2 lenders — the natural result of bolting on new credit every time they needed expansion capital. The equipment term loan sat at 7.8%, originally secured during the 2015 downturn when pricing reflected panic, not credit quality. A mezzanine facility carried an 18% equity dilution trigger that had been imposed during an emergency raise — terms the company had never revisited even as its balance sheet stabilized.

Debt service was consuming 22% of EBITDA — nearly double the healthy range for a services company of this size. Eleven conflicting covenant tests across the four facilities created quarterly compliance headaches that required dedicated controller time and felt more like tax audits than routine reporting. Management was spending more time managing lenders than managing operations.

Related service: Capital Structure Advisory →
Cost of Capital 6.9% → 4.7%
Annual Savings $1.3M
Facilities 4 → 2
Covenants 11 → 4
Debt/EBITDA Ratio 22% → 12%
Timeline 14 Weeks

We designed a consolidated refinancing: a $38M senior secured revolving credit facility with a seasonal accordion feature that expanded capacity by $6M during peak drilling season (Q1 and Q3), plus a $12M equipment term loan repriced at 5.2% — reflecting the company's actual credit profile, not its crisis-era pricing.

The mezzanine facility was eliminated entirely, removing the dilution trigger and saving the founders from giving up 18% of the equity they'd spent 12 years building. We structured a two-lender syndicate with harmonized covenant testing — four covenants instead of eleven, all tested quarterly on the same reporting cycle. Seasonal cash flow patterns were recognized and built into the facility structure, not penalized as volatility.

Within the first year, the freed-up cash flow funded $2.8M in deferred equipment upgrades without additional borrowing.

Led by David Wang & Nathan Grewal. Michelle's team performed forensic cash flow analysis identifying seasonal patterns the original lenders had ignored for three years.

Prairie Harvest Foods Inc. Food Manufacturing Saskatoon, SK Revenue: ~$42M

Second-generation family-owned food processor with 30 years of operating history and a spotless credit record. A $14.5M cold-storage acquisition opportunity was on the table — a vertically integrated facility that would give Prairie Harvest control over their entire cold chain for the first time. This was the biggest strategic move in the company's history, and the family knew they needed to move quickly before a national competitor scooped the asset.

The family had $3M in available equity. Their incumbent bank was willing to lend — but only with personal guarantees from the 68-year-old family patriarch, secured against his personal real estate including the family home. That was a non-starter. Period. The patriarch had spent three decades building a business specifically to avoid putting his family's personal assets at risk, and he wasn't about to change course on the deal that was supposed to be his legacy.

Related service: Acquisition Financing →
Acquisition Value $14.5M
Personal Guarantees Zero
Blended Cost 5.1%
EBITDA Growth +34% in 18 months
Ownership Retained 100%
Timeline 22 Weeks

We structured a $9.5M acquisition term loan secured entirely against the target's own assets — primarily $6.2M in cold-storage real estate that appraised well above carrying value, plus $2.4M in refrigeration and processing equipment. We negotiated a $2M vendor take-back at 4% with the selling family, who were motivated by tax deferral on the gain. The Prairie Harvest family contributed their $3M equity. Total capital stack: $14.5M. Personal guarantees: zero.

James Okafor built the integration model showing $2.1M in annual synergies from eliminated transportation costs, consolidated procurement, and improved cold chain efficiency — projections the board initially called "optimistic." Within 18 months, EBITDA had grown 34%, exceeding even James's projections. The cold-storage facility now operates at 94% capacity and serves as a competitive moat against national competitors.

100% family ownership retained. The patriarch has since stepped back from daily operations, confident the business can sustain itself without personal collateral ever being at risk.

David Wang structured the capital stack. James Okafor led integration modeling. Michelle's team provided forensic due diligence on the acquisition target, identifying $340K in deferred maintenance the seller had not disclosed.

Canopy Digital Infrastructure Corp. Data Centres & Managed IT Edmonton, AB Revenue: ~$28M

Canopy was growing at 40% year-over-year — the kind of trajectory most founders dream about. They needed $7.5M to build a second data centre in Edmonton's southeast industrial corridor, a facility that would double their hosting capacity and allow them to compete for enterprise clients. The incumbent bank declined the loan outright, citing the company's age: "too young," they said. Canopy had been founded in 2018 and had only three years of audited financials.

Two VC firms materialized quickly with term sheets. Both offered the $7.5M. Both wanted 30%+ equity and two board seats each. Amit Patel — the founder and sole owner — was two weeks from signing away a third of his company. He'd bootstrapped Canopy from a single rack in a co-location facility to $28M in revenue, and the idea of handing over board control to investors who'd never operated a data centre kept him up at night. A mutual client of ours — one of the energy services companies we'd worked with — suggested he call us first.

Related service: Growth & Expansion Capital →
Growth Capital $7.5M
Equity Diluted Zero
Effective Cost 8.1%
vs. VC Dilution 30%+ avoided
New ARR Generated $4.8M
Timeline 11 Weeks

Michelle's team built a contract-by-contract analysis of Canopy's entire revenue base: $19.2M in committed future revenue across 74 enterprise clients, with 36-month average contract terms, 94% renewal rates, and weighted average remaining term of 22 months. This wasn't a startup hoping for revenue — it was a recurring-revenue business with contractual certainty that banks simply hadn't been shown how to underwrite.

David secured revenue-based financing from a specialized alternative lender — one of the 40+ capital providers in our network. Repayment was tied to monthly recurring revenue at a fixed percentage, not a rigid amortization schedule. This meant payments scaled naturally with the business: lower during build-out months, higher once the new facility started generating revenue. $7.5M at 8.1% effective cost — roughly 4× cheaper than the equity dilution the VCs were demanding when you calculate the long-term cost of giving up 30% of a company growing at 40% annually.

Zero equity diluted. Full board control retained. The second data centre generated $4.8M in new annual recurring revenue within its first 12 months of operation, and Canopy is now evaluating a third facility in Calgary.

Nathan Grewal identified the alternative lender from our network. Michelle Chen-Wang's forensic contract analysis was the linchpin that made the deal bankable — transforming a "too young" borrower into a predictable cash flow story.

Northern Gateway Construction Group Commercial Construction Grande Prairie, AB Revenue: ~$120M

Northern Gateway had just won a $45M municipal infrastructure contract — the largest in the company's 22-year history and a transformative piece of work that would anchor their revenue for the next three years. The problem: they needed $18M in additional bonding and credit capacity to execute. And they needed it fast — the municipal authority required proof of financing within 45 days or the contract would go to the runner-up, a national firm with deeper pockets.

The incumbent lender saw opportunity in Northern Gateway's urgency. Instead of simply providing the incremental facility, they attempted to reprice the entire $34M existing portfolio upward by 85 basis points and demanded personal real estate collateral from the three founding partners — homes, vacation properties, the works. While the big bank was still scheduling internal committee meetings to discuss the proposal, the 45-day clock was ticking down. Northern Gateway came to us with 31 days remaining.

Related service: Banking Relationship Management →
Facility Secured $18M
Time to Close 31 Days
Annual Savings $340K
Personal Collateral None
Project Outcome $1.2M under budget
Timeline 6 Weeks

Nathan led a competitive process with 5 lenders simultaneously — two Schedule I banks, two credit unions, and one alternative lender. The key insight was structural: instead of trying to expand the existing banking relationship, we proposed a project-specific revolving facility from a credit union syndicate, entirely ring-fenced from Northern Gateway's core banking. This meant the incumbent bank had no leverage to reprice the existing portfolio as a condition of the new facility.

The credit union syndicate was led by Servus Credit Union and backed by Connect First — both eager for construction exposure in the Grande Prairie market. They offered competitive pricing because the contract itself, backed by a municipal government, provided investment-grade credit support. The existing $34M portfolio remained completely untouched at original pricing. No personal real estate collateral from any partner. The 47 successfully completed projects in Northern Gateway's history — which Nathan documented in a detailed track record presentation — made the credit case compelling.

31 days from handshake to close. Our fastest engagement ever, enabled by our streamlined five-phase process. The $45M contract? Delivered $1.2M under budget and two months ahead of schedule — generating a follow-on $28M contract from the same municipality.

Nathan Grewal led the competitive process. Sarah Thornton fast-tracked documentation with three law firms simultaneously, coordinating closing across two provinces in under a week.

Westridge Senior Living Corp. Senior Living / Healthcare Kelowna, BC Revenue: ~$31M

Westridge operated two existing senior living facilities in the Okanagan and was ready for their most ambitious project yet: a 120-bed purpose-built senior living facility on owned land in Kelowna's fastest-growing corridor. Total construction cost: $24M. The project would increase their bed count by 60% and establish them as the dominant independent operator in the Interior BC market.

A previous CMHC application had been rejected outright. The CFO had handled it internally — submitting incomplete 3-year projections instead of the 5-year models CMHC requires, an inadequate market study that covered the wrong geographic catchment area, and missing sensitivity analyses on occupancy ramp-up scenarios. Their accounting firm had told them "CMHC probably isn't the right fit for a private operator this size." Conventional construction financing would have cost $4.2M more over the term — money that would come directly from resident care budgets and future expansion plans.

Related service: CMHC-Insured Financing →
CMHC Loan $24M
Fixed Rate 3.85% / 10yr
Amortization 35 Years
Savings vs. Conventional $4.2M
Occupancy 91% in 8 months
Timeline 18 Weeks

Same project. Same site. Same borrower. Different presentation — and a fundamentally different outcome.

Michelle prepared CMHC-formatted 5-year projections with full sensitivity analysis across three occupancy scenarios (base case 85%, upside 92%, stress case 72%), complete with detailed operating expense assumptions benchmarked against Health Canada data for comparable facilities. James oversaw an independent market needs assessment that properly defined the primary and secondary catchment areas, documenting the 14,000+ seniors aged 75+ within a 30-kilometer radius and the projected 22% growth in that demographic over the next decade. Sarah ensured zoning, building permits, BC Housing registry compliance, and provincial licensing were bulletproof — no open items, no conditions outstanding. David negotiated the final terms: 35-year amortization at 3.85% fixed for 10 years.

Approved on first submission. This was our 9th consecutive CMHC approval — maintaining a 100% first-submission success rate that we believe is unmatched among private advisory firms in Western Canada. The facility hit 91% occupancy within 8 months of opening — faster than any of the three scenarios Michelle had modeled — and now operates at 97% with a 40-person waitlist.

Full team engagement. Michelle Chen-Wang led financial projections. James Okafor managed the market study. Sarah Thornton handled regulatory compliance. David Wang negotiated terms with CMHC and the approved lender.

Athabasca Environmental Solutions Inc. Environmental Remediation Fort McMurray, AB Revenue: ~$55M

Athabasca held three large oil sands reclamation contracts — long-term, high-value work with some of Canada's largest energy producers. The problem wasn't revenue. It was timing. Standard payment terms in the oil sands remediation sector run 90 days, and with $12M in receivables outstanding at any given time against a $5M operating line, the company was perpetually cash-starved despite being profitable on paper.

The owner was deferring his own salary — six consecutive months without a paycheque — to make $1.8M monthly payroll for his 140-person field crew. Equipment maintenance had been deferred three times, and the safety team was flagging hydraulic line wear on two excavators as an emerging risk. Contracts were being turned down not because of capacity, but because the working capital simply wasn't there to mobilize crews. Cash conversion cycle: 94 days. The company was slowly suffocating on its own success.

Related service: Working Capital Optimization →
Working Capital $5M → $10M
Cash Cycle 94 → 38 days
New Contract Capacity $8.4M
Revenue Growth +23% next year
Safety Incidents Zero post-refit
Timeline 10 Weeks

The solution started with a simple observation that the incumbent bank had missed: 78% of Athabasca's outstanding receivables were owed by investment-grade energy companies — Suncor, CNRL, Imperial. These weren't speculative receivables from startups; they were contractual obligations from companies with combined market capitalizations exceeding $150 billion. The credit quality was obvious once someone actually looked at the receivables ledger instead of just the borrower's balance sheet.

Nathan arranged a $10M asset-based lending (ABL) facility with an 85% advance rate against these investment-grade receivables — nearly double the advance rate the incumbent bank had been offering on their generic operating line. The ABL facility was structured with daily borrowing base certificates and weekly reporting, which sounds onerous but in practice automated through a simple accounting integration that Priya helped implement.

David negotiated a separate $3M equipment line specifically earmarked for the deferred maintenance backlog plus two new Caterpillar 390F excavators that the field team had been requesting for over a year. The owner was back on full salary within 30 days. Cash conversion cycle dropped from 94 to 38 days. The freed-up capacity allowed Athabasca to bid on — and win — $8.4M in new contracts. Revenue grew 23% the following year, and the safety incident rate dropped to zero in the six months following the equipment refit.

Nathan Grewal designed the ABL facility structure. David Wang structured the equipment line. Priya Chattopadhyay built the receivables aging analysis and automated reporting integration that proved the credit quality to the ABL lender.

See How These Results Connect to Our Work

Every case study above was delivered through the same team, the same process, and the same philosophy. Explore the details:

Our 10 Services Our 5-Phase Process Industries We Serve Meet the Team Read Our Insights

Every One of These Clients Found Us Through a Referral.

We'd like to earn yours.

Tell us what you're facing — the first conversation is free, confidential, and takes about 28 minutes. We'll tell you honestly whether we can help. If we can't, we'll point you toward someone who can. That's happened 14 times since 2015, and three of those companies came back to us later when the fit was right.

Start a Confidential Conversation

347 initial consultations since 2015. Average call: 28 minutes. Average follow-up: same day. 92% client retention rate.

Important Disclosures

Wang Private Equity Inc. (Alberta Corporation No. 2015-0847231) is a registered capital advisory firm. We are not a bank, credit union, or deposit-taking institution. Client funds are not insured by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) or any provincial deposit guarantee program.

Service fees apply to all advisory engagements. Fee structures are disclosed in full via a written engagement letter before any work begins. Contact us or request our Schedule of Fees for details.

Registered Office: 10115 83 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6A 3X4, Canada.

Wang Private Equity Inc. operates under applicable Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) exempt market provisions and provincial securities regulations. Registration No. EMD-2015-04782-AB.

Case study results are historical and specific to each client's circumstances. Past performance does not guarantee similar outcomes. Client names and certain identifying details are shared with written permission; in some cases, minor details have been altered to protect confidentiality while preserving the accuracy of financial outcomes.